USPTO serial 75222397
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Wuhan City, Hubei Province, CN
Wuhan City, Hubei Province, CN
Wuhan City, Hubei Province, CN
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | HONEY, COFFEE, CHOCOLATE BASED FOOD BEVERAGES NOT BEING VEGETABLE OR DAIRY BASED; COCO-A BASED BEVERAGES WITH MILK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 16, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 16, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |