USPTO serial 75222500
ARTIGIANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARTIGIANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nr Yarmouth, Isle of Wight P041 0TW, GB
Nr Yarmouth, Isle of Wight P041 0TW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AARON B RETZER
AARON B RETZER EPSTEIN EDELL & RETZER1901 RESEARCH BLVD STE 400ROCKVILLE, MD 20850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | woman's fashionwear and outerwear, namely, suits, jackets, skirts, divided skirts, trousers, shorts, blouses, dresses, sweaters, jumpers, pullovers, tunics, cardigans, waistcoats, blazers, tops, vests, trousers, turtle necks, round necks, polo necks, polo shirts, cowl necks, V necks, crew necks, roll necks, T-shirts, sweatshirts, track suits, swimsuits, coats, rain coats, anoraks, scarves, belts, and gloves; and footwear | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |