USPTO serial 75222549
TREE MANAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, GEORGE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TREE MANAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cuyahoga Falls, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for urban forestry and natural resource management applications, namely, the recording, storage and manipulation of information with respect to tree size, species, condition and location; the recording, storage and manipulation of information with respect to tree care maintenance needs, work history, property owner requests, notations and special conditions, and the recommendation of maintenance work; the recording, storage and manipulation of information with respect to planting sites, planting cycles, tree and stump removals; the recording, storage and manipulation of information with respect to tree and utility line interface, specifically utility line clearance and maintenance history, electric circuit information and the location, number and special information with respect to utility lines and poles; the recording, storage and manipulation of information with respect to labor and equipment costs and rates and future and past expenditures with respect to urban forestry and natural resource management; the creation, storage and printing of summary and specific reports, maps and graphs with respect to the aforementioned information for management and budgetary purposes | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |