USPTO serial 75222729
MYSTIC GARDEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUNN, ELIZABETH A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYSTIC GARDEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd
Rosebery, New South Wales, 2018, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd
Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd
Rosebery, New South Wales, 2018, AU
Other trademarks owned by Aristocrat Leisure Industries Pty Ltd
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren Krupka
Lauren Krupka Aristocrat Technologies, Inc7230 Amigo StreetLegal DeptLas Vegas, NV 89119Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | gaming equipment, namely, poker machines and parts therefor | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 1998 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 28, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 20, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |