Drawing for NEURODYNAMICS

USPTO serial 75223121

NEURODYNAMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NEURODYNAMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BARBARA R SHUFRO

BARBARA R SHUFRO PILLSBURY MADISON & SUTRO LLPE TWR1100 NEW YORK AVE NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software, namely, neural network software developed for and applied to pattern recognition and image processing with applications such as fingerprint, face and handwriting recognition and matching, and license plate, passport and commercial transport container recognition, and video monitoring and surveillanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 16, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 16, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 12, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 6, 1999IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 6, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 5, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 14, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance