USPTO serial 75223216
MAXIMIZER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WOLFSON, FRANCES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAXIMIZER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEHRINGER Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH
D - 47877 Willich - Munchheide II, DE
Other trademarks owned by BEHRINGER Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH
BEHRINGER Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH
D - 47877 Willich - Munchheide II, DE
Other trademarks owned by BEHRINGER Spezielle Studiotechnik GmbH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RANDOLPH C FOSTER
RANDOLPH C FOSTER STOEL RIVES LLP900 SW 5TH AVESTE 2600PORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical and digital sound equipment for home and professional use, namely, electronic sound amplifiers and audio mixers; apparatus for recording sound and transmitting sound and/or images, namely, audio mixer consoles, sound enhancers, sound limiters, multi-effects processors, and sound composers; headphones, microphones, audio tape recorders and transmitters; blank magnetic data carriers, blank recording discs, and data processing equipment, namely, computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2001 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 2, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 19, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |