USPTO serial 75223382
PIG.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2267835Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 1999
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PIG.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carrie L. Johnson
Carrie L. Johnson Cargill, IncorporatedP.O. BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-5624UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing advice to swine producers, namely, providing advice, consultation and information regarding resources needed for the operation of swine producing facilities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 17, 2009 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2005 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 8, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |