USPTO serial 75226560
AESTHETIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERNELL, JANEL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AESTHETIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M MUCHMORE
SUSAN M MUCHMORE COUDERT BROS1627 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumery for personal use, namely, perfumes, eau de parfum, parfum de toilette, concentrated eau de toilette, eau de toilette, eau de cologne, splash cologne; personal care soaps, namely, toilet soaps, bath soaps and shaving soaps; products for body and beauty care, namely pre shave lotion, after shave lotion, shaving cream and foam, after shave cream and emulsion, moisture lotion, emulsion and cream, deodorant and anti perspirant cream, talc, sticks and lotions, also in the form of atomiseurs and roll-on devices, spray talc, body cream and lotion, hand cream, hand balm, massage cream, gel and oil and makeup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |