USPTO serial 75227939
WORLDCOM. ONE WORLD. ONE COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORLDCOM. ONE WORLD. ONE COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH D FINCHER
JOSEPH D FINCHER HALL ESTILL HARDWICK GABLE GOLDEN ET AL320 S BOSTON AVE STE 400TULSA, OK 74103-3708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunications services, namely, personal communication services and telecommunication gateway services; cellular telephone services; mobile radio and cellular communications; delivery of messages by electronic transmission; electronic store-and-forward messaging; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic voice messaging, namely, the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; facsimile transmission via cellular communications; rental of telecommunication equipment; audio teleconferencing; telephone communication services; and data and voice telecommunication | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |