USPTO serial 75230840
AFFINITY MEDIA INCORPORATED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AFFINITY MEDIA INCORPORATED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
F LAWRENCE HARASYM III
12021 WILSHIRE BLVD NO 933LOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1200UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | data management, software development, multimedia products | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
| 042 | computer services, namely, designing multimedia software and providing information regarding the development and integration of software tools and services for companies in data-intensive industries, such as engineering, architecture, government, healthcare, manufacturing and distribution, for use with the global computer network | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 20, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |