USPTO serial 75233227
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
92000 Nanterre, FR
92000 Nanterre, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. CLIFFORD
JOHN A CLIFFORD MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic payment terminals, machines for automatically printing or reading characters on checks, memory cards or magnetic track readers, machines for printing or coding titles with a view to permit service usage (financial transaction, communication, transport, parking, access control), data processing apparatus and equipment for checking and collecting pieces of information as to the working of payment terminals, check processing machines, cash registers, calculators, magnetic cards; compact disks and optical disks in the field of electronic payments; check readers, data processing peripherals for money, memory cards and magnetic track cards, invoicing machines, electronic apparatus and equipment for electronic funds transfers; computers and computer software in the field of electronic fund transfer and electronic payments; programmed electronic fund transfer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | credit and debit card services; financial services in the field of electronic fund transfer | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance and repair of electronic payment terminals, machines for printing or reading characters on checks, memory cards or magnetic track readers, machines for printing or coding titles, data processing apparatus, check processing machines, cash registers, calculators, invoicing machines, and printers | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | communication through data processing terminal equipment in order to process electronic payments, electronic mail services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | maintenance of computer software, renting of electronic payment terminal machines for automatically printing or reading characters on checks, memory cards, or magnetic track readers, machines for printing or coding titles, data processing apparatus, check processing machines, cash registers, calculators, invoicing machines, printers; renting of access time to a database, utility consultancy in matters of data processing and engineering | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2000 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |