Drawing for PYRAMID SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75235119

PYRAMID SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PYRAMID SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN G CHUPA

JOHN G CHUPA THE CHUPA LAW FIRM PC31313 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 205FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in managing and documenting fund raising contributions and managing charity projects; interactive virtual reality video game software; interactive virtual reality video games comprised of computer hardware and software; computer and video game software, cartridges and discs; video game machines for use with televisionsACTIVENov 9, 1990
028Games, namely, adult and children's party games, arcade games, handheld unit for playing video games; teaching games, namely, board games, card games, role playing games, parlor games, manipulative games and action skill gamesACTIVENov 9, 1990
035Commercial information and directory agency services provided via the internet; business information provided via the internet, namely, marketing, demographic and customer behavior data; dissemination of advertising for others via the internet; computerized database management related to databases featuring goods for sale over the internetACTIVENov 9, 1990
036Charitable fund raisingACTIVENov 9, 1990
041Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games and lotteries and competitions via a global computer networkACTIVENov 9, 1990
042Design, development, maintenance, installation and integration of computer software for others; database development services for others featuring the development of databases containing games, lotteries and competitionsACTIVENov 9, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 5, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jun 19, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Mar 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 6, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Dec 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 12, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance