USPTO serial 75235119
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G CHUPA
JOHN G CHUPA THE CHUPA LAW FIRM PC31313 NORTHWESTERN HWY STE 205FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in managing and documenting fund raising contributions and managing charity projects; interactive virtual reality video game software; interactive virtual reality video games comprised of computer hardware and software; computer and video game software, cartridges and discs; video game machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
| 028 | Games, namely, adult and children's party games, arcade games, handheld unit for playing video games; teaching games, namely, board games, card games, role playing games, parlor games, manipulative games and action skill games | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
| 035 | Commercial information and directory agency services provided via the internet; business information provided via the internet, namely, marketing, demographic and customer behavior data; dissemination of advertising for others via the internet; computerized database management related to databases featuring goods for sale over the internet | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
| 036 | Charitable fund raising | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, providing online computer games and lotteries and competitions via a global computer network | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
| 042 | Design, development, maintenance, installation and integration of computer software for others; database development services for others featuring the development of databases containing games, lotteries and competitions | ACTIVE | Nov 9, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |