USPTO serial 75239651
DIELECTRIC ARC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MADDEN, ANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIELECTRIC ARC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | semiconductor wafer processing equipment and components, namely, epitaxial reactors, chemical vapor deposition reactors, physical vapor deposition reactors, plasma etchers, ion implanter, chemical mechanical polishers; and computer operating programs for use therewith | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | repair and maintenance services for semiconductor wafer processing equipment, and components | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 4, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 14, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |