USPTO serial 75242273
SLIM LINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLIM LINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P COOPER
200 PACIFIC BLDG520 SW YAMHILL STPORTLAND, OR 97204Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HARDWARE FOR MOUNTING COMPUTER MONITORS | ACTIVE | Feb 20, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |