USPTO serial 75242801
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
HENDERSON, NV
American Technology Corporation
San Diego, CA
American Technology Corporation
San Diego, CA
American Technology Corporation
San Diego, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter M. de Jonge
Peter M. de Jonge Thorpe North and Western, LLP.P.O. Box 1219Sandy, UT 84091-1219UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | sound reproduction equipment, namely, speakers,[ televisions, radios, computers, telephones, ] ultrasonic sound emitters for indirectly generating audible sound, and control circuitry for mixing frequencies | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 14, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Nov 19, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 5, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 3, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |