USPTO serial 75244282
CHAIN MASTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2609991Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- CHICOSKI, JENNIFER D
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CHAIN MASTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
D-04838 Eilenburg, DE
Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
D-04838 Eilenburg, DE
Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
D-04838 Eilenburg, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KARL HORMANN
KARL HORMANN, LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 38151686 SPARKS STREETCAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | electric winches, hoists, drives and transmissions for machines and motors for use with staging, scenery and settings, drives for stage curtains, and electric generators for stage illumination | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
| 009 | electromechanical controls for use in lifts, conveyors, hoists, stage machinery, lighting suspensions, lifting platforms, and curtain systems, and computer software to direct the actions thereof; electromechanical controls for use in vehicles to move stage equipment and scenery, and computer software to direct the actions thereof; and electromechanical controls for providing variable velocities to lifts, conveyors, hoists, stage machinery, lighting suspensions, lifting platforms, and curtain systems, and computer software to direct the actions thereof | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
- Other trademarks owned by Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
- Other trademarks owned by Chain Master Buehnentechnik GmbH.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CHAIN MASTER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2010 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 31, 2010 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 29, 2009 | 15AB | AFFIDAVIT UNDER SECT 15 ABANDONED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PR15 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 15 | — |
| Sep 2, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | 15AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 AFFIDAVIT FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 22, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |