Drawing for APPLEPHENON

USPTO serial 75244876

APPLEPHENON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLEPHENON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD M PRINCE

EDWARD M PRINCE CUSHMAN DARBY & CUSHMAN1100 NEW YORK AVE NW 9TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3918UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001apple extract for use as an ingredient in the manufacture of foods, beverages, cosmetics, toiletries, pharmaceuticals, pet foods, animal feeds, veterinary preparations, personal hygiene preparations and household sanitary preparationsACTIVE
003apple extract for use in the cosmetic and toiletry industryACTIVE
005apple extract for use in the pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary industryACTIVE
030apple extract for use in the food and beverage industryACTIVE
031apple extract for use in the pet food and animal feed industryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2001EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 14, 2001EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Nov 19, 2000EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 1, 2000REINREINSTATED
Aug 8, 2000EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jul 27, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 19, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 29, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Sep 21, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 27, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 22, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 25, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 15, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 22, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 7, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance