USPTO serial 75245273
CANDYMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LORENZO, ROBERT
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CANDYMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chocolate, candies, marshmallow and chewing gum | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 15, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |