USPTO serial 75246794
MOBILISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, GLENN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOBILISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westlake Village, CA
Westlake Village, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JIMMY FENDRYCH
JIMMY FENDRYCH MOBILISTICS3883 VIA PESCADOR #ECAMARILLO, CA 93012-5053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic equipment for use in land vehicles, water craft and air craft, namely, global navigation systems comprising control modules and monitors; communication systems comprising mobile telephones, cellular telephones and radiotelephones, mobile two-way or more communication devices, namely, pagers, modems, computers, citizen band radios, amateur radios, and two-way radios; entertainment systems comprising mobile sound recording, playback and radio receivers, car radios and stereos, car tape recorders and players, speakers, amplifiers, equalizers, CD players, CD changers; antennas and mounting hardware all sold as a unit with the above identified goods | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2003 |
| 012 | burglar alarms for vehicles and remote starters for vehicles and mounting hardware all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 1, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 6, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |