USPTO serial 75249292
TOTAL CARD MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2258181Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 29, 1999
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TOTAL CARD MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcia T. Greci
Marcia T. Greci Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP1320 Main Street, 17th FloorColumbia, SC 29201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | management of credit card services for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 2010 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 14, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 30, 2006 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |