USPTO serial 75253068
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY FRANCES LOVE
MARY FRANCES LOVE WENDEROTH LIND & PONACK LLP2033 K ST NW STE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1002UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computers; computer peripheral devices; data processors and word processors; computer local area networking system; computer interfaces; electronic visual display units; modems; couplers; graphics cards; computer memories; plotters; printers, scanners; readers; keyboards; track balls; mouses, digitizers; electronic pens; liquid crystal display units; cathode ray tube display units; computer software for controlling images displayed on monitor screens; computer programs for controlling images displayed on monitor screens; optical disc drives; audio response units; televisions; projectors; facsimile machines; electrical connectors; printed circuits; electronic copying machines; blank magnetic data carriers; blank magnetic discs, tapes or wires; blank floppy discs; blank cassettes; blank optical discs; video cameras; microphone; radio receiver units; loudspeakers; parts and fitting for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | repair services, all relating to electrical appliances, film projectors, office machines and to photographic apparatus; installation of electrical appliances, office machines and office equipments; maintenance of film projectors, office machines and of office equipment; information services, all relating to repair services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing multiple use access to a global computer information network for the transfer and dissemination of a wide range of information; consultancy services, all relating to computer hardware; computer programming for others; computer software design for others; computer rental; rental of computer software; updating of computer software; research and development of new products; all relating to computers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |