USPTO serial 75253358
MOBILE TELESTRUCTURES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COOPER, VANESSA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOBILE TELESTRUCTURES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WARREN F.B. LINDSLEY
WARREN F B LINDSLEY CAMEL SQ4350 E CAMELBACK RD STE 200 EPHOENIX, AZ 85018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal containers, portable metal buildings, and/or pre-fabricated metal buildings for the storage and housing of electronic equipment for the wireless industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | leasing of storage containers, shelters and buildings for use with electronic equipment for the wireless industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2000 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |