USPTO serial 75257716
TITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 10, 2001
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AURORA, IL
St. Charles, IL
St. Charles, IL
St. Charles, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK E WIEMELT
MARK E WIEMELT ESQ LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. WIEMELT, PCSTE 330010 S LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | control systems for extruder equipment consisting of monochrome CRT screens, color screens, keypad interfacing, touch screen interfacing, light beams, joy sticks, thumb wheel interfacing, PLC systems for logic coordination and control, computers for data acquistion, reporting historical trending and related data manipuation, software and related graphs for physical process and machine depiction, cable and communication interface hardware, and componentry for temperature, speed, speed coordination, pressure monitoring and alarm, start up sequencing, shutdown, and safety interlocking feedback | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROCESSING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Processing Technologies, inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Processing Technologies, inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Processing Technologies, inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TITAN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 31, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |