USPTO serial 75259973
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Bernardino, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT W DICKERSON
ROBERT W DICKERSON LYON & LYON633 W 5TH ST 47TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power operated wood, tree and turf-processing equipment, namely, multures, tree stumpers, root grinders, wood chippers and branch chippers | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 9, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |