Drawing for DORNIER

USPTO serial 75264617

DORNIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DORNIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LESLIE K. MITCHELL

LESLIE K MITCHELL FITZPATRICK CELLA HARPER & SCINTO30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ 38TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10112-3801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003soaps, perfume, essential oils for personal use, cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip liner, eye pencil, eye liner, eye shadow, mascara, blush, powder, makeup foundation, and nail polishACTIVE—
009sunglasses, spectacle frames, lacrosse helmets, football helmetsACTIVE—
012vehicles for locomotions by land and water, namely, automobiles and boatsACTIVE—
014chronometersACTIVE—
018leather, namely, shopping bags, travel bags, luggage trunks; leather sold in bulk, imitation leather sold in bulk; leather bags for merchandise packaging, namely, envelopes, pouchesACTIVE—
025men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, pants, skirts, shirts, blouses, vests, sweaters, dresses, shorts, jackets, coats, socks, hosiery, suits, footwear, head wearACTIVE—
028games, playthings, gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, golf bags, golf bag tags, golf bag covers, golf ball markers, golf balls, golf carts, golf club heads, golf club inserts, golf club shafts, golf clubs, golf gloves, golf irons, golf putters, golf club head covers, golf club hand grips, tennis balls, tennis nets, tennis rackets, tennis racket covers, tennis racket strings, table tennis balls, table tennis paddles, table tennis nets, table tennis tables, table tennis post sets, squash balls, squash rackets, squash racket strings, badminton rackets, badminton shuttlecocks, badminton uprights, badminton racket strings, polo mallets, polo balls, field hockey balls, field hockey sticks, field hockey goalie pads, netballs, basketballs, basketball nets, lacrosse balls, lacrosse sticks, lacrosse pads, lacrosse gloves, racquetballs, racquetball rackets, volleyballs, volleyball nets, volleyball uprights, volleyball pads, baseballs, baseball bats, baseball gloves, baseball mitts, batting gloves, batting tees, baseball bases, footballs, football shoulder pads, soccer balls, goalkeeper's gloves, handballs, handball gloves, rugby balls, board games, jigsaw puzzles, manipulative puzzles, manipulative games, cubestyle puzzles, model airplanes, model train sets, model vehicles, electronically operated toys, mechanical action toysACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 1, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 22, 2002EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 18, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 8, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 7, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 2, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 16, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 3, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance