USPTO serial 75271021
CARBOLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARBOLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
1970 CA IJMUIDEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
1970 CA IJMUIDEN, NL
Other trademarks owned by HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY P VENTURINO
ANTHONY P VENTURINO STEVENS DAVIS MILLER & MOSHER LLP1615 L ST NW STE 850WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5622UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemicals in the form of granules, for use in metallurgical processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | petroleum based dust absorbing compositions in the form of granules for use in gases and fuels | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | chemical processing services, namely, processing chemicals in the form of granules for use in metallurgical processing and processing petroleum based dust absorbing compositions in the form of granules for use in gases and fuels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
- Other trademarks owned by HOOGOVENS TECHNICAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT BV
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named CARBOLITE
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |