USPTO serial 75271713
INFOCRYPT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INFOCRYPT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BEDFORD, MA
Toronto, Ontario, M9C 2A8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELAINE A MARTEL
ELAINE A MARTEL SHIVA CORP28 CROSBY DRBEDFORD, MA 01730UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware, namely, an encrypting router computer software for encrypting communications across dedicated, shared or public networks computer software for use in association with the management of encryrption keys computer software for creating digital certificates, certifying digital certificates and authenticating users and encrypting routers computer software for providing encrypted communication for use across dial-up modem lines | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |