USPTO serial 75277205
HYDRO TONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HYDRO TONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 161, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN H WEBER
JOHN H WEBER OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical apparatus and instruments, namely, hydrotherapy equipment, namely, hydrojets, hand-operated water jets for use in therapeutic massage, whirlpools for thepapeutic use, shower benches for therapeutic use, bath tubs and bath tubs for therapeutic use | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 23, 2000 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 1999 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 5, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |