USPTO serial 75280464
TNX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TNX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELAINE V KEIM
ELAINE V KEIM FORE SYSTEMS INC1000 FORE DRWARRENDALE, PA 15086UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |