USPTO serial 75283402
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | consulting in the field of public relations, including public relations for businesses in the area of investor relations and promotional campaigns | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 2000 |
| 041 | electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text and graphic works of others on the global computer network in the fields of healthcare and education | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 1998 |
| 042 | consulting in the field of designing and maintaining interactive sites on the global computer network for others in the healthcare, education, financial services, entertainment, hospitality and publishing industries | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 10, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 6, 1998 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 1998 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |