USPTO serial 75286335
ACCU-RITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DICKINSON, RODNEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACCU-RITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Jefferson, NY
Port Jefferson, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL M CISLO
DANIEL M CISLO CISLO & THOMAS LLP233 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 900SANTA MONICA, CA 90401UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | anticounterfeiting paper tags, plastic labels, and other indicators, namely, cardboard/paper holding film having magnetic particles which display magnetic polarity, and nonelectronic viewers in the nature of paperboard sheets with resilient covers for seeing the display of magnetic polarity for identifying authentic goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 1998 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |