USPTO serial 75286717
HOCUS POCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOCUS POCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
1011 GS Amsterdam, NL
1011 GS Amsterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M COLLEN
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PC80 SO HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | magic tricks | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 2, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |