USPTO serial 75286799
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOUIS TREIGER
700 5TH AVE STE 6100SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software which (a) includes an integrated and cross-platform IP (Internet Protocol) management solution which incorporates standards-based technologies (such as DNS and DHCP) with a relational database and graphical user interface, (b) provides a central repository for all the TCP/IP name space information for an organization, and (c) distributes such information to the proper servers within the organization | ABANDONED | Jul 14, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1999 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 11, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |