USPTO serial 75288352
VIEWPOINT TC BY BOUNDLESS TECHNOLOGIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIEWPOINT TC BY BOUNDLESS TECHNOLOGIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL CAYWOOD
MICHAEL CAYWOOD LOCKE PURNELL RAIN HARRELL100 CONGRESS AVE STE 300AUSTIN, TX 78701-4042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and network products and software, namely, network computers, web-enabled devices, namely, Internet terminals, Internet computers, Java-based computers, Windows-based terminals, servers, other terminals and peripherals; global computer network-enabled devices, namely, network-enabled computers, servers, terminals, and peripherals; related software for facilitating and managing communications between such products; computer peripherals; and computer connectors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |