USPTO serial 75293128
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
Atlanta, GA
Other trademarks owned by Peachtree Creek Consulting Group, Inc.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY H. GELLER
JAY H GELLERW TWR STE 40002425 W OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business marketing consulting services, business research, developing promotional campaigns for business and creating trademarks and brand names for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2001 |
| 042 | research and development of new products for others and product development consultation | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 11, 2001 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |