USPTO serial 75295895
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Redwood City, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHANIE K. WADE
STEPHANIE K. WADE DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | scientific research; bacteriological and virological research; laboratory research in the field of genetics pharmaceuticals, bacteriology, virology, and research and product development services for others in the fields of genetics pharmaceuticals, bacteriology, virology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 29, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 9, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |