USPTO serial 75299813
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INGLEWOOD, CA
INGLEWOOD, CA
Los Angeles, CA
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
ATLANTA, GA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John M. Kim
JOHN M KIM. GRAY CARY WARE & FREIDENRICH LLP401 B ST STE 1700SAN DIEGO, CA 92101-4297UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | multi-party video chat computer application software distributed via a global computer information network primarily to home personal computer users of said network, namely, software for use on a personal computer for real-time audio, video, and text message exchange via said personal computer over a global computer information network, computer software used to maintain and manage a communications directory on computer servers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 9, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |