USPTO serial 75301602
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plymouth Meeting, PA
Plymouth Meeting, PA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura Genovese Miller
LAURA GENOVESE MILLER WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTZ MACKIEWICZ ET AL1 LIBERTY PL 46TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic apparatus, namely, an optical scanner with mechanical transport for automatically feeding documents and which analyzes, collects, and transmits data contained in the scanned document for use by lottery agents | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 30, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 26, 1999 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 26, 1999 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 21, 1999 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |