USPTO serial 75305243
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JANE M MARCINISZYN
JANE M MARCINISZYN CHATTMAN GAINES & STERN1350 EUCLID AVE STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44115UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer products services, namely, designing home pages for others; computer network services, namely, providing facilities for others to host material accessible via the network; global computer network programming services; and Intranet applications | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 30, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |