USPTO serial 75305570
RTD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 1999
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RTD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
3046 NC Rotterdam, NL
Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
3046 NC Rotterdam, NL
Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
3046 NC Rotterdam, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Non-destructive inspection machines designed to ensure the safe installation of technical equipment by means of ultrasonic data, radiography, magnetic particles, pulsed eddy current, dye penetrant and thermography | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | installation, maintenance, and repair of non-destructive inspection equipment and accessories with respect to ensuring the safe installation of technical equipment, by means of ultrasonic data, radiography, magnetic particles, pulsed eddy current, dye penetrant and thermography | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | non-destructive inspection services of technical installations of machinery and equipment for nuclear power plants, ships, petro-chemical plants, bridges, land and subsea pipelines, storage tanks, offshore drilling operations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Rontgen Technische Dienst B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RTD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 7, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 6, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 2, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 1998 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |