USPTO serial 75310576
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Princeton, NJ
Princeton, NJ
PRINCETON, NJ
RICHMOND, VA
RICHMOND, VA
AKRON, OH
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SCOT A. DUVALL
SCOT A. DUVALL Middleton Reutlinger2500 Brown & Williamson Tower401 S. Fourth AvenueLouisville, KY 40202| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | manufacture of tissue growth matrices, scaffolds, implantable, [ oral and transdermal drug delivery devices, in vitro drug diagnostic instruments, three dimensional biological models, ] bone scaffolds, all for use in the biomedical field, all to the order and specification of others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 19, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 26, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |