USPTO serial 75318325
HEALTHEMES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILBERT, REBECCA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALTHEMES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD G. MARTIN
RICHARD G MARTIN MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD LLCONE MARITIME PLZ 4TH FL720 WATER STTOLEDO, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing health care information | ACTIVE | Apr 7, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2000 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |