Drawing for HOT CHOCOLATE

USPTO serial 75324702

HOT CHOCOLATE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SEEGARS, GERALD C.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOT CHOCOLATE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

NORM D ST LANDAU

CHRISTA M COLE CALIFORNIA TAN INC10877 WILSHIRE BLVD 12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003skin care products, namely, tanning lotionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2005COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 7, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 29, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Nov 29, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Nov 29, 1999EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Jan 14, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Sep 11, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Aug 21, 1998CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 19, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 27, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance