USPTO serial 75325507
RODEO DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 10, 2000
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with RODEO DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN ZAFMAN
NORMAN ZAFMAN BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD 7TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card services which also provide the user with special offers from retail establishments and other businesses on Rodeo Drive and surrounding area | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 29, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 6, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |