USPTO serial 75328260
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALBERT J BRENEISEN
ALBERT J BRENEISEN KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | foundation garments | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 23, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 30, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |