USPTO serial 75329271
EPX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EPX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario M2J 5C9, CA
HOLLADAY, UT
HOLLADAY, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES W MCKEE
JAMES W MCKEE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | (Based on Foreign Basis) BITUMINOUS CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND SURFACES, SUCH AS COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ROOFING, WATERPROOFING AND PAVING | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | (Based on Intent to Use) CHEMICAL PROCESSING SERVICES, NAMELY, MANUFACTURE OF BITUMINOUS CONSTRUCTION COMPOSITIONS TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS, SUCH AS ROOFING MATERIALS, WATERPROOFING AND PAVING COMPOSITIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by POLYPHALT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by POLYPHALT L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by POLYPHALT L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named EPX
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 31, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |