USPTO serial 75332302
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Consolidated Development Limited
LONDON, W1, GB
Consolidated Development Limited
LONDON, W1, GB
Consolidated Development Limited
LONDON, W1, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALLAN RATNER
ALLAN RATNER RATNER & PRESTIAP O BOX 980VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0980UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |