USPTO serial 75333054
ROLFS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLFS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PHILIP T GOLDEN
PHILIP T GOLDEN WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINICK PC5400 RENAISSANCE TWR1201 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75270-2199Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | retail stores featuring personal accessories, such as luggage, briefcases, attache cases, handbags, wallets and the like | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 20, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 20, 2001 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Nov 23, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| May 25, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 25, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 31, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |