USPTO serial 75334842
XTRAVAGANZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3118573Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 25, 2006
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with XTRAVAGANZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HERTFORD, HERTS, GB
Bucks. BP6 6ER, GB
Bucks. BP6 6ER, GB
Bucks. BP6 6ER, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID EHRLICH
DAVID EHRLICH FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GOLD HAWK MUSIC LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Extravaganza Records Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Extravaganza Records Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Extravaganza Records Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named XTRAVAGANZA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2013 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |