Drawing for MICROCHIP

USPTO serial 75344812

MICROCHIP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MICROCHIP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009HOUSE MARK FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR CONTROLLING THE OPERATION OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY, SEMICONDUCTORS AND INTEGRATED CIRCUITSACTIVEJan 1, 1988

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 24, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance